Author / Message

HAC or Junghans ????

Thomas B



Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 3
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 7:33 pm     Post subject: HAC or Junghans ????

Hi!
I am new to your forum and hope someone can clue me in.
I have a wooden clock that was apparently used as a preentation. There is a brass label added on to the front that is in german. My guess is that it says "the 25th Jubilee Commander volunteer firemen 1908 - 1933"
The striking movement has crossed arrows maker mark, W77, 183/40 over 92 (sort of like a algebra formula), bottom of case has N551 40.

I have found the cross arrows was used by HAC (hamburg american clock co.) I have also found places where HAC merged with Junghans in either 1930 or 1933. I am guessing this clock was sold in 1933. Since there is no name on the face of the clock, is it considered a HAC or a Junghans????
Any help would be appreciated.
View user's profile Send private message
Chris



Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 960
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:33 pm     Post subject:

I hope that this information may help... http://www.clockswatches.com/foreign/showpage.php?em=1065
View user's profile Send private message
Chris



Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 960
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:35 pm     Post subject:

The next thread will contain a post which details information about HAC trademarks and names (see post number eight).
http://mb.nawcc.org/showthread.php?t=15512
View user's profile Send private message
Chris



Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 960
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:35 pm     Post subject:

Not certain if any of this helps, but I did find it extremely interesting. From what I have read, I would consider your clock a HAC clock (strictly opinion). I wonder if the "40" is an indication of year of manufacture (as suggested in thread #6 from the second link)?
View user's profile Send private message
Thomas B



Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 3
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:25 pm     Post subject:

Chris,
Thanks so much for your help.
I had already viewed the first link you provided, but the other one with post #8 was very enlightening. I guess I am not the only one who is confused. If the 40 is the date then I think the movement was not the original one. That is because of the presentation label on the front of the case, which has 1908 - 1933.
I find it very interesting dealing with older items because finding the right answers can be very challenging.

Thanks again for your help and your opinion.

Thomas B
View user's profile Send private message
clokfxr



Joined: 16 Sep 2007
Posts: 442
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 7:58 pm     Post subject:

the 183 is probably how many beats it does per minute.

not sure about the 40

92 is the length of the pendulum in cms
View user's profile Send private message
Thomas B



Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 3
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 12:42 am     Post subject:

clokfxr,
Thanks a lot for your response. This clock is a mantle clock and so has no pendulum, Is there a way to tell if the movement is designed to have a pendulum, but does not have one. In other words the movement that is in the clock is the wrong one. ???????/
Thomas B
View user's profile Send private message
clokfxr



Joined: 16 Sep 2007
Posts: 442
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:56 pm     Post subject:

you should have a hook or square hole on which to put the pend if it takes one.
View user's profile Send private message
All times are GMT


 


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum